Special:Badtitle/NS90:Talk:Discussion space for Internet NZ monitoring framework//Draft Internet Freedom Checklist/reply (2)

Also this case, in which the Court of Human Rights has, for the first time in a judgment on the merits, clarified that a conviction based on copyright law for illegally reproducing or publicly communicating copyright protected material can be regarded as an interference with the right of freedom of expression and information under Article 10 of the European Convention. Such interference must be in accordance with the three conditions enshrined in the second paragraph of Article 10 of the Convention.

https://inforrm.wordpress.com/2013/01/26/case-law-court-of-human-rights-ashby-donald-v-france-copyright-versus-freedom-expression-dirk-voorhoof-and-inger-hoedt-rasmussen/